PRACTICES
Consumer ProtectionSecurities Fraud
EDUCATION
University of Florida Levin College of LawJ.D., 2014
University of Western Ontario
B.M.O.S., 2011
ADMISSIONS
- Texas
- Florida
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
- U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
V-Card
-
Davis v. D.R. Horton Inc., 2020 WL 6042091 (D. Del. Oct. 13, 2020)
(overruling objections to report and recommendation, and denying motion to dismiss claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Davis v. Mindshare Ventures LLC, 2020 WL 3246329 (S.D. Tex. June 12, 2020)
(preliminarily approving $1.3 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Davis v. D.R. Horton Inc., 2020 WL 1244848 (D. Del. Mar. 16, 2020)
(report and recommendation recommending denial of D.R. Horton's motion to dismiss and motion to strike in proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Sheean v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., 2019 WL 6039921 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2019)
(granting final approval to $3.75 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
-
Williams v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., No. 8:17-CV-01971-T-27AAS, Doc. 67 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 27, 2019)
(granting final approval to $1.269 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Sotomayor v. Bank of America, N.A., 377 F. Supp. 3d 1034 (C.D. Cal. May 3, 2019)
(denying Defendant's motion to dismiss Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims of non-California putative class members for lack of personal jurisdiction)
-
Gamble v. New England Auto Finance, Inc., 735 Fed.Appx. 664 (11th Cir. May 31, 2018)
(affirming district court's order denying the defendant's motion to compel arbitration of claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, LLC, No. 9:17-cv-80393-ROSENBERG/HOPKINS, Doc. 53 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2018)
(granting final approval to $1.432 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Gamble v. New England Auto Finance, Inc., 281 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 2017)
(denying the defendant's motion to compel arbitration of claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Gilmore v. USCB Corporation, 2017 WL 5230922 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 9, 2017)
(denying the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings)
-
Gilmore v. USCB Corporation, 323 F.R.D. 433 (M.D. Ga. 2017)
(granting the plaintiff's motion to declare ineffective offer of judgment to named plainiff in proposed class action because "[t]his 'pick off' attempt 'is an abuse of the Federal rules that is designed to do nothing more than frustrate class actions.'”)
-
Dickens v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership, 706 Fed.Appx. 529 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2017)
(reversing the district court's order denying class certification, and holding that a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act plaintiff is entitled to a trial by jury on statutory damages)
-
Garmendiz v. Capio Partners, LLC, 2017 WL 3208621 (M.D. Fla. July 25, 2017)
(denying Defendant's motion to stay action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)