(denying the defendant's motion to dismiss in proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act) 

(certifying nationwide class under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act consisting of "All persons throughout the United States (1) to whom Snap Finance LLC placed, or caused to be placed, a call, (2) directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service, but not assigned to a current or former Snap Finance LLC accountholder, (3) in connection with which Snap Finance LLC used an artificial or prerecorded voice, (4) from September 1, 2019 through September 21, 2021," and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)

(denying the defendant's motion to stay proposed class action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

(denying the defendant's motion to stay proposed class action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

(granting final approval to $2.9 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)

(overruling objections to report and recommendation, and denying motion to dismiss claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

(preliminarily approving $1.3 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)

(report and recommendation recommending denial of D.R. Horton's motion to dismiss and motion to strike in proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

(granting final approval to $3.75 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

(granting final approval to $1.269 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

(denying Defendant's motion to dismiss Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims of non-California putative class members for lack of personal jurisdiction)

(affirming district court's order denying the defendant's motion to compel arbitration of claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

(granting final approval to $1.432 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

(denying the defendant's motion to compel arbitration of claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)

(denying the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings)

(granting the plaintiff's motion to declare ineffective offer of judgment to named plainiff in proposed class action because "[t]his 'pick off' attempt 'is an abuse of the Federal rules that is designed to do nothing more than frustrate class actions.'”)

(reversing the district court's order denying class certification, and holding that a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act plaintiff is entitled to a trial by jury on statutory damages)

(denying Defendant's motion to stay action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)