Consumer Protection

The attorneys at Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC frequently litigate cases involving companies and individuals alleged to have used unfair or deceptive business practices. The Firm's attorneys are currently prosecuting, and have successfully prosecuted, a number of consumer protection class actions in courts throughout the United States, including:

Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims

Representative matters include:

Knapper v. Cox Communications. Inc. (District of Arizona)
($10.75 million class action settlement under the TCPA).

Johnson v. Navient Solutions, LLC. (Southern District of Indiana)
($19.74 million class action settlement under the TCPA).

Cross v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Northern District of Georgia)
($30.4 million class action settlement under the TCPA).

Prater v. Medicredit, Inc. and The Outsource Group, Inc. (Eastern District of Missouri)($6.75 million class action settlement under the TCPA).

Jones v. IQ Data International, Inc. (District of New Mexico)($1 million class action settlement under the TCPA).

Ritchie v. Van Ru Credit Corp (District of Arizona)($2.3 million class action settlement under the TCPA. Participating class members received over $1,650 each).

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claims

Representative matters include:

Gonzalez v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC, 2015 WL 738329 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2015)(class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., which included the issuance of a nationwide injunction).

Green v. Dressman Benzinger Lavelle, PSC, 2015 WL 223764 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2015)(class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., which resulted in cash payments to each member of the class).

Donnelly v. EquityExperts.Org, LLC, 2015 WL 249522 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 14, 2015)(class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., which resulted in payments to Class members of between $50 to over $3,200 each).

Electronic Fund Transfer Act claims

Representative matters include:

Esposito v. Deatrick & Spies, P.S.C., 2015 WL 390392 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2015)(class action settlement under Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693, et seq., which resulted in payments of $250 to each class member)

The Firm also handles:

• Consumer Leasing Act claims
• Truth in Lending Act claims
• Fair Credit Reporting Act claims
• Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act claims
• Credit Repair Organization Act claims
• Claims pursuant to state deceptive and unfair trade practices statutes

The Firm's attorneys are knowledgeable and experienced in the various legal claims and defenses available in cases alleging deceptive, unfair, illegal, or fraudulent business practices, and have particular experience with class actions alleging consumer fraud.