PRACTICES
Consumer ProtectionEDUCATION
University of Miami School of LawADMISSIONS
- Texas
- Florida
- Illinois
United States District Courts
- Northern District of Illinois
- Middle District of Florida
- Southern District of Florida
- Western District of Tennessee
- Western District of New York
- Eastern District of Texas
- Southern District of Texas
- Western District of Texas
- District of Nebraska
- Southern District of Indiana
- Central District of Illinois
- Eastern District of Michigan
United States Circuit Courts of Appeals
- Fourth Circuit
- Fifth Circuit
- Seventh Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
- Tenth Circuit
- Eleventh Circuit
United States Supreme Court
-
Smith v. Assurance IQ, LLC, 2023-CH-09225 (Cook County, Ill. Sept. 3, 2014)
(granting final approval to $21.875 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Radvansky v. Kendo Holdings, Inc., --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2014 WL 3811996 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 13, 2024)
(denying the defendant's motion to dismiss claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and finding that protections afforded under the National Do-Not-Call Registry can apply to cellular telephone numbers)
-
Abboud v. Circle K Stores Inc., 2024 WL 1765659 (D. Ariz. April 24, 2024)
(denying Circle K's motion to dismiss claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and sustaining class action allegations)
-
Lee v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 2024 WL 1366831 (S.D. Tex. March 31, 2024)
(sustaining, in large part, class action allegations regarding appliances sold with a black stainless steel fininsh while concealing and omitting that the finish was a temporary, thin plastic coating—rather than a colored metal finish—and that the finish was prone to premature peeling, flaking, and degrading)
-
Lee v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 2024 WL 578572 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2024)
(denying, in large part, motion to dismiss claims regarding kitchen applicances with a black stainless steel finish that was a temporary, thin plastic coating--rather than a coated metal finish--where the finish was prone to premature peeling, flaking, and degrading)
-
Lucas v. Synchrony Bank, 2023 WL 3143816 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 25, 2023)
(granting final approval to $2.6 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Wesley v. Snap Finance LLC, 2023 WL 1812670 (D. Utah Feb. 7, 2023)
(granting final approval to $5 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act where participating settlement class members will receive over $2,450 each, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Miles v. Medicredit, Inc., 2023 WL 1794559 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 7, 2023)
(granting final approval to $1.95 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Jackson v. Discover Bank, 2023 WL 1813593 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 7, 2023)
(preliminarily approving $1 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)
-
Lucas v. Synchrony Bank, No. 4:21-cv-70-PPS, Doc. 47 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 18, 2022)
(preliminarily approving $2.6 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)
-
Wesley v. Snap Finance, LLC, 2022 WL 4544927 (D. Utah Sept. 28, 2022)
(granting preliminary approval to $5 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Lee v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 2022 WL 4243957 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2022)
(report and recommendation recommending the denial, in large part, of Samsung's motion to dismiss and sustaining claims regarding allegedly defective black stainless steel appliances)
-
Jackin v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2022 WL 2111337 (E.D. Wash. June 10, 2022)
(denying the defendant's motion to dismiss claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
-
Hogans v. Charter Communications, Inc., 2022 WL 1500859 (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2022)
(denying Charter Communications' request to appeal the denial of its motion to dismiss proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Wesley v Snap Finance LLC, 2022 WL 482156 (10th Cir. Feb. 16, 2022)
(denying Snap Finance's request for permission to seek interlocutory review of the district court's order certifying a nationwide class under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Head v. Citibank, N.A., 340 F.R.D. 145 (D. Ariz. 2022)
(certifying nationwide class under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act consisting of "all persons and entities throughout the United States (1) to whom Citibank, N.A. placed a call in connection with a past-due credit card account, (2) directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service, but not assigned to a current or former Citibank, N.A. customer or authorized user, (3) via its Aspect dialer and with an artificial or prerecorded voice, (4) from August 15, 2014 through January 27, 2022," and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)
-
Hogans v. Charter Communications, Inc., 2021 WL 4391226 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2021)
(denying the defendant's motion to dismiss in proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Wesley v. Snap Finance, LLC, 339 F.R.D. 277 (D. Utah 2021)
(certifying nationwide class under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act consisting of "All persons throughout the United States (1) to whom Snap Finance LLC placed, or caused to be placed, a call, (2) directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service, but not assigned to a current or former Snap Finance LLC accountholder, (3) in connection with which Snap Finance LLC used an artificial or prerecorded voice, (4) from September 1, 2019 through September 21, 2021," and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Neal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Synchrony Bank, 2021 WL 1108602 (W.D.N.C. March 19, 2021)
(granting final approval to $2.9 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)
-
Bonoan v. Adobe, Inc., 2021 WL 912257 (N.D. Cal. March 10, 2021)
(granting final approval to $1 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)
-
Davis v. Mindshare Ventures, LLC, No. 4:19-cv-01961, Doc. 56 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2020)
(granting final approval to $1.3 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Neal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2020 WL 6157779 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2020)
(preliminarily approving $2.9 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-Class Counsel)
-
Davis v. D.R. Horton Inc., 2020 WL 6042091 (D. Del. Oct. 13, 2020)
(overruling objections to report and recommendation, and denying motion to dismiss claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Bonoan v. Adobe, Inc., 2020 WL 6018934 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2020)
(preliminarily approving $1 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-lead Class Counsel)
-
Davis v. Mindshare Ventures LLC, 2020 WL 3246329 (S.D. Tex. June 12, 2020)
(preliminarily approving $1.3 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Davis v. D.R. Horton Inc., 2020 WL 1244848 (D. Del. Mar. 16, 2020)
(report and recommendation recommending denial of D.R. Horton's motion to dismiss and motion to strike in proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Drake v. FirstKey Homes, LLC, 2020 WL 1672522 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 20, 2020)
(denying, in large part, FirstKey Homes, LLC's motion for summary judgment in proposed robocall class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and denying FirstKey's motion to strike class action allegations)
-
Knapper v. Cox Communications, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00913-SPL, Doc. 126 (D. Ariz. Dec. 13, 2019)
(granting final approval to $10.75 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Drake v. Mirand Response Systems, Inc. and Woodforest National Bank, 2019 WL 6620874 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 3, 2019)
(denying the defendants' motion to stay proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Sheean v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., 2019 WL 6039921 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2019)
(granting final approval to $3.75 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
-
Williams v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., No. 8:17-CV-01971-T-27AAS, Doc. 67 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 27, 2019)
(granting final approval to $1.269 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Sotomayor v. Bank of America, N.A., 377 F. Supp. 3d 1034 (C.D. Cal. May 3, 2019)
(denying Defendant's motion to dismiss Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims of non-California putative class members for lack of personal jurisdiction)
-
Williams v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., 2019 WL 1450090 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2019)(preliminarily approving $1.269 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Knapper v. Cox Communications, Inc., 329 F.R.D. 238 (D. Ariz. 2019)
(certifying nationwide class of consumers who received wrong number debt collection robocalls from Cox Communications, Inc. and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Knapper v. Cox Communications, Inc., 2019 WL 250430 (D. Ariz. Jan. 17, 2019)
(denying Cox Communications, Inc.'s motion to stay proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Dickens v. GC Services Limited Partnership, 336 F. Supp. 3d 1369 (M.D. Fla. 2018)
(certifying class of Florida consumers harmed by GC Services' violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and denying GC's motion to compel arbitration)
-
Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, LLC, No. 9:17-cv-80393-ROSENBERG/HOPKINS, Doc. 53 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2018)
(granting final approval to $1.432 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Williams v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., 2017 WL 6507226 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 15, 2017)
(denying motion to stay proceedings under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, LLC, 2017 WL 6060778 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2017)
(preliminarily approving $1.432 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as class counsel)
-
Gilmore v. USCB Corporation, 2017 WL 5230922 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 9, 2017)
(denying the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings)
-
Luster v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-01058-TWT, Doc. 80 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 8, 2017)
(granting final approval to $14.8 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Gilmore v. USCB Corporation, 323 F.R.D. 433 (M.D. Ga. 2017)
(granting the plaintiff's motion to declare ineffective offer of judgment to named plainiff in proposed class action because "[t]his 'pick off' attempt 'is an abuse of the Federal rules that is designed to do nothing more than frustrate class actions.'”)
-
Prather v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:15-CV-04231-SCJ, Doc. 55 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 31, 2017)
(granting final approval to $2.05 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Dickens v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership, 706 Fed.Appx. 529 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2017)
(reversing the district court's order denying class certification, and holding that a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act plaintiff is entitled to a trial by jury on statutory damages)
-
Garmendiz v. Capio Partners, LLC, 2017 WL 3208621 (M.D. Fla. July 25, 2017)
(denying Defendant's motion to stay action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Johnson v. Navient Solutions, Inc., f/k/a Sallie Mae, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-0716-LJM, Doc. 177 (S.D. Ind. July 13, 2017);
Toure and Heard v. Navient Solutions, Inc., f/k/a Sallie Mae, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-0071-LJM-TAB (S.D. Ind July 13, 2017)(final approval of $19.74 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Knapper v. Cox Communications, Inc., 2017 WL 2983912 (D. Ariz. July 10, 2017)
(denying Defendant's motion to stay proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
James v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2017 WL 2472499 (M.D. Fla. June 5, 2017)
(granting final approval to $3.75 million settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Schwyhart v. AmSher Collection Services, Inc., 2017 WL 1034201 (N.D. Ala. Mar. 16, 2017)
(granting final approval to nearly $1 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Harper v. The Law Office of Harris and Zide, LLP, 2017 WL 995215 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2017)
(granting final approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
-
Jallo v. Resurgent Capital Partners, L.P., 2017 WL 914291 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2017)
(granting final approval to class action settlement under teh Fair Debt Collection Practies Act)
-
Prather v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2017 WL 770132 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2017)
(preliminary approval of $2.05 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Luster v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-01058-TWT, Doc. 60 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 23, 2017)
(preliminary approval of $14.8 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Cross v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:15-cv-01270-RWS, Doc. 103 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 20, 2017)
(granting final approval to $30.4 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-lead Class Counsel)
-
Bowden v. Bright House Networks, LLC, 2017 WL 57343 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 5, 2017)
(denying Defendant's motion to stay proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
James v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2016 WL 6908118 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of $3.75 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Jallo v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P., 2016 WL 6610322 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Schwyhart v. AmSher Collection Services, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-1175-JEO (N.D. Ala. Oct. 19, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Cross v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2016 WL 5109533 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 13, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of $30.4 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as co-lead Class Counsel)
-
Markos v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2016 WL 4708028 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 7, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of $16.4 million class action settlement under the Telpehone Consumer Protection Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as additional Class Counsel)
-
Johnson v. Navient Solutions, Inc., 315 F.R.D. 501 (S.D. Ind. 2016)
(certifying class consisting of each person and entity throughout the United States (1) to whom Navient Solutions Inc. placed one or more telephone calls (2) directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service, (3) by using an automatic telephone dialing system, (4) after the person or entity informed Navient that it was calling the wrong telephone number, (5) between May 4, 2011 and March 7, 2016, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Hernandez v. Williams, Zinman & Parham PC, 829 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2016)
(reversing the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, holding, as a matter of first impression, that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act requires any debt collector—first or subsequent—to send a validation notice within five days of its first communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt)
-
Rogers v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 190 F. Supp. 3d 1144 (N.D. Ga. 2016)
(denying motion to dismiss and finding that the plaintiffs have standing to bring their claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Harper v. Law Office of Harris and Zide LLP, 2016 WL 2344194 (N.D. Cal. May 4, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Schuchardt v. Law Office of Rory W. Clark, 314 F.R.D. 673 (N.D. Cal. 2016)
(granting final approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Brown v. Hunt & Henriques, Attorneys at Law, Case 5:15-cv-01111-EJD, Doc. 45 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Schwyhart v. AmSher Collection Services, Inc., --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2016 WL 1620096 (N.D. Ala. Apr. 22, 2016)
(denying motion to stay proposed class action under Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Lehmeyer v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A., 2016 WL 1576439 (D. Minn. Apr. 15, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Schuchardt v. Law Office of Rory W. Clark, 2016 WL 232435 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2016)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Coumsel)
-
Johnson v. Navient Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Sallie Mae, Inc., 150 F. Supp. 3d 1005 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 2015)
(denying the defendant's motion to stay claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Prater v. Medicredit, Inc. and The Outsource Group, Inc., 2015 WL 8331602 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 2015)
(granting final approval of $6.75 million class action settlement under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Jones v. I.Q. Data International, Inc., 2015 WL 5704016 (D.N.M. Sept. 23, 2015)
(granting final approval of $1 million class action settlement under Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Jallo v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP and LVNV Funding, LLC, 2015 WL 4722177 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2015)
(denying Defendants' motion to compel arbitration)
-
Prater v. Medicredit, Inc. and The Outsource Group, Inc., 2015 WL 4385682 (E.D. Mo. July 13, 2015)
(granting preliminary approval of $6.75 million class action settlement, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Jones v. I.Q. Data International, Inc., 2015 WL 2088969 (D.N.M. Apr. 21, 2015)
(granting preliminary approval of $1 million class action settlement, and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as class counsel, for claims under Telephone Consumer Protection Act)
-
Gonzalez v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC, 2015 WL 738329 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2015)
(granting final approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Jallo v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. and LVNV Funding, LLC, 2015 WL 307468 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2015)
(sustaining allegations under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq.)
-
Rodriguez v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC, 2015 WL 178161 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2015)
(granting preliminary approval of class action settlement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., and appointing Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Chatman v. GC Services, LP, 2014 WL 5783095 (D.S.C. Nov. 6, 2014)
(granting summary judgment as to liability on behalf of the Lead Plaintiff in proposed class action under 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(11) and 15 U.S.C. § 1692d(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)
-
Chatman v. GC Services, LP, 302 F.R.D. 136 (D.S.C. 2014)
(denying motion to dismiss claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.)
-
Hunter v. Nicholas Financial Corp., No. 0:13-cv-61126-DMM, Doc. 32 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 28, 2014)
(granting final approval of class action settlement under Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. §1693, et seq. and appointing Greenwald Davidson PLLC as Class Counsel)
-
Kennedy v. Compucredit Holdings, et al., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (M.D. Fla. 2014)
(sustaining claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. and the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1679 et seq.)